Andy Burnham Launches State-Owned Great British Grid to Cut Electricity Bills, Britons Told to Keep Emergency Generators Handy
Labour Promises Cheap Electricity by 2036, British Taxpayers Advised to Keep Their Candles, Firewood and Bank Statements Until Further Notice
LONDON, October 12, 2026 — Prime Minister Andy Burnham has announced another ambitious intervention in Britain's energy industry, having apparently decided that what the country's expensive, heavily regulated electricity system really lacks is one more publicly owned organisation. According to Reuters' report on Great British Grid, the Labour government will set up the new body inside Great British Energy and promises faster connections, more competition and, within a decade, energy costs in line with the rest of Europe.
The reasoning is easy enough to follow. When an industry turns expensive, slow and hard to run, you add a layer of management. Not more electricity, not necessarily fewer rules, and not, as far as anyone can establish, a smaller bill this winter. Management.
Britain can't connect businesses to the grid quickly enough, so Labour is creating a government body to make sure everyone responsible for connecting businesses to the grid can meet regularly and talk about connecting businesses to the grid. The meetings are expected to be electrifying.
Thinking About State-Owned British Grid
- So Britain's short of electricity, and the fix is more bureaucrats. That's like hearing the pub's run out of beer and hiring three blokes with clipboards.
- Cheaper electricity in ten years. Ten! I've had dental appointments booked sooner than that. That's roughly 120 monthly bills between now and the promise, and I'm supposed to trust the guy.
- Great British Energy, now Great British Grid. Give it a week. Great British Plug. Great British Socket. Great British Committee for Deciding Which End Goes in the Wall.
- The government's launching a competitor to private firms. That's not competition, that's the referee pulling on a shirt and asking you not to tackle him.
- State ownership doesn't make it cheaper, it just lets them charge you twice, once on the bill and once in tax. It's the only business where the invoice shows up two times and nobody apologises.
Great British Grid Explained: Another Public Body Inside Great British Energy
Great British Grid will sit inside Great British Energy, which exists to put public money into clean power. Around it are the National Energy System Operator, which runs and plans the system, Ofgem, which regulates it, and the network companies that actually own the wires. The government's official Great British Grid announcement, published by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, says the newcomer will complement those institutions instead of replacing any of them, and that the role of the existing network operators stays as it is.
So nothing is being abolished. Britain is acquiring an extra bureaucracy whose job is to talk to the existing ones. Picture a restaurant where the food is taking forever because the kitchen is swamped, the chef has gone home sick and a waiter has quit. The owner's answer is to hire a second manager.
Carry that logic on for a few years and the country will have more bodies responsible for electricity than appliances plugged into it. A taxpayer in Birmingham, waiting for a bus on Corporation Street, summed it up for us.
"I can't work out why my electricity costs what it does, but apparently there's a shortage of people on £120,000 a year to explain it to me."
Burnham's 2036 Pledge: Cheaper Electricity, Delivered After Several Elections
Burnham told ITV News he wants Britain's energy costs brought into line with other European countries within ten years. Ten years. Not ten weeks, not ten months.
It is a politician's dream of a deadline, because nearly anything can happen in a decade. Governments fall, ministers resign, economic forecasts quietly expire and children grow up and start receiving electricity bills of their own. By 2036 the people making today's promises will quite possibly have moved on to consultancy, where they'll advise the next government on why the previous government's targets were a bit optimistic. Carbon Brief's round-up of the coverage found the ten-year price target to be the only date attached to the plan.
We asked a pensioner in Leeds how she felt about cheaper electricity in 2036. "Lovely," she said. "Will they let me pay this winter's heating bill in 2036 as well?"
The Treasury is understood to be looking at a payment scheme called Heat Now, Prosper Later. Households would get immediate access to optimistic government announcements, while the actual savings stay subject to technological progress, administrative review and the continued existence of civilisation.
Does State Ownership Cut Electricity Bills? Public Investment vs Private Cost
Labour's core argument is that public ownership and investment can lower costs while speeding up energy projects. Supporters add that public capital can finance infrastructure whose benefits reach well beyond what any single private investor could collect. That's a genuine economic argument and it deserves a proper hearing.
The trouble is that money doesn't turn free when the Treasury spends it. A new transmission line that costs a billion pounds costs a billion pounds whether the cash comes from investors, taxpayers or the Chancellor's emergency drawer. Public financing changes who funds a project and who collects the returns. It does nothing to the price of steel, copper, engineering or construction. Conservative shadow energy secretary Andrew Bowie made a similar point to ITV, arguing that families would end up paying twice.
Take an ordinary household with an expensive electricity bill. Under the current setup it pays its supplier, and Ofgem's guide to how an electricity bill is calculated shows where that money goes. Under the Labour version it pays the supplier, then contributes through taxes to the public energy company, then helps fund the department that issues the congratulatory press releases.
An accountant in Sheffield called it a financial innovation. "Before, people were annoyed because electricity was expensive," he said. "Now they can be annoyed because electricity is expensive and they own shares in something they can't sell."
Competitive Tendering of Transmission Projects: Government Joins the Race
One of the government's more interesting promises is that Great British Grid will increase competition. The announcement says ministers will speed up the competitive tendering of transmission projects so a wider range of organisations, Great British Grid among them, can bid to build new network infrastructure.
That gives us a curious arrangement. The government sets the policy, funds its own entrant and then announces that competition is thriving. Ofgem, the announcement stresses, remains the independent economic regulator, which will be a comfort to everyone else in the race. Think of Manchester City entering a competition in which the referee, the fixtures committee and the disciplinary panel all work from offices paid for by Manchester City's owners. The club might well still lose. The other teams would nevertheless want to read the rulebook closely.
A private infrastructure contractor asked an official whether bidding against a taxpayer-backed rival counted as a level playing field. The official said every competitor would be treated equally, provided proposals arrived on time, met the environmental requirements and accepted that the government's preferred solution already appeared on the departmental website.
The real test is simple: do measurable costs come down and do projects get built faster? If they don't, Britain will have found a way to nationalise the press release.
Grid Connection Queue Reform: Ofgem, 125 Gigawatts and the Data Centre Backlog
The connections problem is real. On 29 July Ofgem reported that applications for electricity demand connections had jumped from 41 gigawatts to 125 gigawatts in under a year, driven largely by data centres. The regulator opened a consultation on proposed data centre connection reforms, including a commitment fee of between £237,500 and £712,500 per megawatt for large data centres. The fee would be refunded once a project is energised and forfeited if it drops out of the queue early. The consultation closed on 16 September.
The government says it is also working with the National Energy System Operator and Ofgem to strip more than 300 gigawatts of speculative capacity out of the wider connections queue. In fairness, Ofgem says earlier reforms have already brought forward about 7.8 gigawatts of projects by an average of six years.
None of that changes the picture on the ground. Britain has businesses ready to invest, projects waiting for a connection and a network struggling to keep up, and the queue has become the one line in the country where you could reasonably expect to die of old age before reaching the front.
A manufacturer in Newcastle applies for power for a new factory. The application is acknowledged, reviewed, forwarded, assessed and returned for clarification. Eventually a letter arrives confirming approval in principle, subject to confirmation that Britain still has a manufacturing industry. Some firms are now wondering whether a factory would connect faster if it registered as a government consultancy.
Self-Build Grid Connections: Private Enterprise, Rebranded
The announcement also promises reforms to expand self-build connections, so developers and businesses can build their own grid connections where appropriate instead of waiting for the network companies. It points to Ireland, where similar reforms cut connection times by up to 11 months.
Sensible enough. It is also quietly funny that one of the headline measures in a plan for a bigger state role amounts to letting businesses get on with it themselves. Seen from the right angle, it reads like a revolutionary socialist discovery: sometimes private enterprise can do a job without first waiting for a government department.
Great British Grid Jobs: Directors, Spreadsheets and Regional Associates
A new public organisation needs staff, and plenty of them. There will be directors, accountants, procurement specialists, administrative coordinators and communications officers. Somebody will also have to look after workplace wellbeing, since finding out the electricity hasn't arrived can be quite stressful. The first organisational chart will probably need a power supply of its own.
Run the numbers on a bad day and Britain could employ 600 people to manage the construction of one pylon, with another 200 investigating why the pylon is twelve months late. An internal report would then blame insufficient staffing, and 300 more people would be hired. Before long every village has a Regional Associate Director of Community Electricity Stakeholder Engagement, and the village is still waiting on a transformer.
One advert circulating for the new body sets out the opportunity. "Candidates must possess excellent communication skills, substantial experience managing delays and the ability to describe an unfinished project as a successful milestone." Previous experience of generating electricity is desirable but not essential.
Reindustrialisation and Industrial Electricity Prices: Factories Need Power First
The government says Great British Grid will help reindustrialise Britain, which is a perfectly admirable goal. Factories need dependable power, competitive prices and reliable infrastructure, and they need investors who believe the running costs won't wreck their margins. The difficulty isn't only that grid infrastructure is complicated. Energy costs shape whether firms invest in Britain at all. The International Energy Agency's chart of industrial electricity prices for energy-intensive industries, 2019 to 2025, gives a sense of the international cost pressure these businesses are under.
A factory owner explained his position at an economic summit. "We make steel components," he said. "The government wants us to take on another hundred workers. I'd love to, but electricity costs so much that it's cheaper to import the finished parts and hire the factory out for weddings." His business plan was later praised for promoting economic diversification.
Ministers are now reported to be wondering whether Britain can reindustrialise by producing brochures about the benefits of reindustrialisation. The brochures will be printed overseas.
Planning, Pylons and Physics: What Ministers Can't Legislate
Moving electricity around is a physical business. Lines have to be built, transformers installed, equipment manufactured and land rights negotiated, and the power has to be generated somewhere before it can be delivered anywhere. None of this gets easier because a politician announces that the government is taking responsibility. Copper doesn't get cheaper after a Labour conference. A transformer can't be talked into working by a passionate speech in the Commons, and a pylon won't assemble itself because a minister has declared a national mission. The laws of physics have shown no interest in party manifestos.
One proposal doing the rounds would sidestep the problem with an Electricity Acceleration and Positive Outcomes Act. Every electron would be legally required to move faster. Any electron missing its performance targets would be called before a parliamentary committee, and persistent offenders would be referred to Ofgem for disciplinary action.
Great British Grid Funding: Start-Up Costs Covered, Long-Term Budget Pending
The government's announcement contains a revealing detail about money. The initial start-up costs for Great British Grid will come out of Great British Energy's existing budgets, and the long-term budget for the expanded remit will be considered at a future spending review. So the long-term finances haven't been settled in public yet.
It's an odd way to promise major infrastructure. Imagine hiring a builder who says the drawings are done, the project has a stirring name and the finish date is ten years off. You ask what it'll cost. He tells you the first few meetings are already paid for. You ask about the actual construction, and he says that'll come up at the next spending review. In Britain this is called strategic infrastructure planning. Anywhere else the customer would ring another builder.
A retired Treasury official gave us his own definition. "Public investment is private investment where the investor can't say no, the management can't easily be replaced and the dividend arrives as a ministerial announcement." The great advantage of the model is that a government's early enthusiasm needn't be spoiled by a full long-term budget.
Who Is Accountable If Energy Bills Are Still High in 2036?
The real question isn't whether Britain needs better electricity infrastructure. It plainly does. Nor is public involvement incapable of producing something useful, since well-designed public investment can fill genuine gaps in a market. What matters is whether Great British Grid delivers measurable improvements beyond the reforms already under way. Will businesses connect faster? Will construction costs actually fall? Will taxpayers get value for money? Will industrial electricity become more competitive? And if energy costs are still stubbornly high in 2036, who takes the blame?
British administration has a long record of creative answers. The government might commission an independent review, which would identify structural challenges, which would call for a new strategic delivery organisation, which would recommend further reform. Eventually another Prime Minister announces Great British Grid Two. It would sit inside Great British Grid, which sits inside Great British Energy, next to the other institutions in charge of getting electricity from one place to another. The whole thing starts to look like a Russian nesting doll in which every doll needs a salary, a pension and a departmental electricity account.
The Verdict: Britain Needs More Power, Not Merely More People in Charge of Power
Great British Grid is meant to tackle a genuine infrastructure problem, and whether it works will depend on delivery, spending discipline, cooperation with the existing operators and the physical business of getting projects built. Unfortunately for Burnham, the public can't heat their homes with good intentions. They can't run factories on optimism or power a fridge with an organisational chart.
There is something very British about promising cheaper electricity in ten years while setting up another organisation to supervise the organisations that already supervise the electricity system. By 2036 the government could point to wider public participation in energy infrastructure, thousands of administrative roles, hundreds of consultations and a mountain of documents. It might even have cut costs.
If it hasn't, Britain will still own the world's first electricity organisation able to generate unlimited political energy without producing a single watt. A perpetual-motion machine run on taxpayers, bureaucracy and parliamentary speeches. And when the next power cut comes, citizens can take comfort in one thing: the committee investigating the darkness will be extremely well lit.
10 Humorous Observations: Why Burnham's Great British Grid Could Become Britain's Next Great Socialist Power Failure
- Burnham wants to reindustrialise. Great. Factories need cheap power. Meanwhile half the ones we've got left are luxury flats called The Foundry, with a bit of girder in the lobby so you know it's authentic.
- The grid connection queue is so long you can wait for a factory hookup through three Prime Ministers and still just get a "we've received your application" email.
- Labour has discovered that making electricity and delivering electricity are different jobs. Benjamin Franklin worked that out with a kite in a thunderstorm and we needed a white paper.
- They say the grid will speed up construction. Sure. Nothing makes a pylon grow like a mandatory half-day stakeholder engagement workshop with a facilitated breakout session.
- Matching European prices by 2036. Which Europe? France? France has nuclear and a better attitude. Either we get as cheap as France or France gets as expensive as us, and I know where I'd put my money.
- A new body, inside an existing company, sitting next to the existing regulators. Finally, a renewable resource: government departments. Leave them in the dark and they breed.
- Start-up costs come from existing budgets, the long-term money gets sorted "later." That's not a financial plan, that's a wedding. That's also how I've done every kitchen I've ever renovated.
- Another government organisation to reduce delays. Anyone who's ever applied for planning permission in Britain just laughed so hard they've had to lie down.
- Businesses will be allowed to build their own grid connections. Revolutionary. It turns out a person can do a thing without filling in a form first. Somebody tell the Treasury.
- The real danger isn't that nothing comes out of it. It's the thousands of reports, a dozen executive jobs, a glossy annual presentation and several million slides, and not one extra kilowatt-hour. Britain will be the best-documented dark country in Europe.
Satirical Disclaimer
Great British Grid is a real government initiative. The economic statistics and policy details referenced above come from published reporting and official sources. The dialogue, interviews, hypothetical reports, job advertisements and predictions of administrative catastrophe are satirical commentary, not accounts of actual events. The programme's eventual performance remains to be determined. https://prat.uk/burnhams-state-owned-british-grid/
Comments
Post a Comment