Kemi Badenoch proposes allowing families to inherit their own houses without the Treasury arriving at the funeral carrying a calculator
BIRMINGHAM - Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has announced a controversial proposal to stop the government collecting inheritance tax on family homes, threatening one of Britain's most established traditions, which is the Treasury examining a person's remaining possessions immediately after they stop breathing.
Speaking at the Conservative Party conference, Badenoch pledged to take family homes out of inheritance tax and to let couples pass on up to £1 million in other assets tax-free, The Times reports. The proposals form part of a broader Conservative programme of tax reductions and spending restraint.
The announcement has disturbed supporters of the existing system, who fear that allowing people to keep wealth accumulated by their parents could undermine Britain's long-standing commitment to taxing financial activity at every possible stage of existence.
Inheritance Tax Reform: Treasury Insists Death Must Not Become a Tax Avoidance Strategy
The British tax system has developed a remarkably thorough understanding of the human life cycle. Citizens pay income tax when they earn money and VAT when they spend much of it. They pay council tax while living in their homes and may pay stamp duty when buying those homes. After decades of meeting their obligations they eventually die, at which point the Treasury checks whether there is anything left worth taxing again.
Inheritance tax is charged at 40% on the taxable part of an estate above the applicable allowances. Relatively few estates currently pay it, although rising property values and frozen thresholds have raised concerns about future liabilities. Critics argue that the tax matters for fairness, since inherited wealth can deepen inequality. Supporters of reform argue that families should not face a heavy tax merely for handing their home to the next generation.
Both sides agree that housing in Britain has become extraordinarily expensive. They disagree about whether the answer is to make inherited houses cheaper to keep or to make sure their new owners pay the government something before they receive the keys.
House-Rich Families Discover That Being Asset-Wealthy Does Not Mean Being Able to Afford Heating
The central absurdity of the property market is that an elderly couple can own a house worth £800,000 while living on a pension that does not stretch to repairing the garden fence. According to their estate agent they are wealthy. According to their bank account they are wondering whether the cat really needs branded food. Colin and Pat Hartnoll, 74 and 71, of Solihull, said they had been told by three separate advisers that they were sitting on a fortune, and by a fourth that the fortune would need a new boiler.
Their children may inherit a valuable property and still be unable to afford a comparable home on ordinary earnings. Government policy has produced a peculiar form of British prosperity in which wealth accumulates in bricks while younger generations accumulate tenancy agreements.
Badenoch's proposal would let more families pass on property without inheritance tax. Opponents warn that the biggest financial benefits would go to households with valuable homes, particularly in London and the South East. That sets up a disagreement about fairness. Should the government tax inherited wealth to reduce inequality, or should it ease the heavy tax burden already placed on families trying to build up assets? The Institute for Fiscal Studies has examined the question at length and Westminster, with its customary delicacy, has responded by accusing both sides of threatening civilisation.
Government Cannot Inherit Money From People Who Spend It All First
The Treasury expects inheritance tax receipts to rise as property values climb and more estates fall within its scope, which is an important revenue opportunity. The Office for Budget Responsibility includes the receipts in its forecasts. The taxpayers supplying that revenue are, unfortunately, not generally available to give feedback afterwards.
A government that wants additional money can therefore raise taxes on living voters or collect more from estates. The second option has obvious electoral advantages. Dead taxpayers seldom organise demonstrations or complain about government spending, and none has successfully demanded a refund.
There is, however, a practical difficulty in designing fiscal policy around death. Families planning their finances need certainty, understandable rules and reasonable confidence that the government will not change the inheritance arrangements halfway through their retirement. Constant policy changes encourage expensive tax planning, legal consultations and elaborate family discussions about whether Grandmother should give away the house while continuing to live in it.
For the moment, Badenoch's proposal remains an opposition pledge and not law. The British public must therefore go on confronting two unavoidable facts of life, which are death and taxation. The Treasury's achievement has been to arrange matters so that when the first finally arrives, the second still wants an appointment.
Five Humorous Observations
- You pay tax when you earn it, tax when you spend it, tax when you buy the house, tax while you live in the house, and when you die they check if there's anything left. It's a gym membership with a funeral clause.
- An £800,000 house, and the owners are wondering if the cat needs the nice food. That's not rich, that's a very expensive tent.
- The government loves taxing the dead. They never complain, never march, never write to their MP. Best customers a Treasury ever had.
- Grandma gives the house to the kids and keeps living in it. That's not tax planning, that's a very long visit.
- Both sides agree houses are too expensive. It's the only thing in Westminster everyone agrees on, and the only thing nobody's doing anything about.
Satire: this is parody based on the reporting linked above. Colin and Pat from Solihull, their boiler and the reactions are invented, and no estate was taxed in the making of this disclaimer. More UK satirical news awaits, along with an explanation of what prat means, which passes to the next generation entirely tax-free. https://prat.uk/?p=51824
Comments
Post a Comment